Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326088›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Maternal Substance Use, Child Maltreatment Risk, and Child Welfare Policy: An Equality-Based, Child-Centered Framework.

Joy Ivaschenko, Gavin L Brunsvold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joy IvaschenkoPsychiatry, Christ Health Center, Birmingham, USA.
Gavin L BrunsvoldPsychiatry, Christ Health Center, Birmingham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use within caregiving environments is associated with increased risk of child maltreatment and adverse developmental outcomes. Child welfare systems often emphasize family preservation and reunification; however, in certain contexts, these goals can conflict with the need to prioritize child safety when risk factors are not adequately addressed. This narrative review and policy analysis examines the intersection of maternal substance use, child maltreatment, and reunification practices through an equality-based, gender-neutral accountability framework, synthesizing evidence from a range of clinical, epidemiological, and child welfare studies. A structured narrative review and policy analysis were conducted using PubMed, JAMA, the American Psychological Association, and Google Scholar, along with governmental and epidemiological reports. Literature addressing caregiver substance use, child maltreatment, trauma exposure, foster care, reunification, and long-term developmental outcomes was screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and synthesized narratively by thematic category. Exposure to caregiver substance use and associated forms of maltreatment (verbal, emotional, psychological, physical, and abandonment) is strongly and consistently associated with increased risk of long-term mental health disorders, behavioral dysregulation, and chronic health conditions. Reunification without sustained behavioral change and verified safety is often associated with higher levels of re-traumatization in children. Child welfare policies may benefit from emphasizing gender-neutral, sustained behavioral change prior to reunification and from prioritizing child-reported safety and long-term stability in reunification decisions over permanent re-homing.

Indexed as

abandonmentchild abusechild rightsparental substance abusepost-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)

Identifiers

PMID42326088
PMCPMC13276961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.