Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326056›Full record

ArticleThe chronicle of mentoring & coaching2025

SPNSOR: A Structured Mentorship Network Intervention to Support Postdoctoral Success.

Amanda Carbajal, Felicia Setiono, Alexandra Kuvaeva, Fátima Sancheznieto, Erik Simmons, W Marcus Lambert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The chronicle of mentoring & coaching, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda CarbajalSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research.
Felicia SetionoSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research.
Alexandra KuvaevaSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research.
Fátima SancheznietoSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research.
Erik SimmonsSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research.
W Marcus LambertSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research.

Funding

Understanding the Science of Effective Mentorship Networks for Underrepresented ResearchersR35GM151017 · NIGMS · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI William Marcus Lambert · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a pressing need for evidence-based, holistic mentoring programs to support STEM postdoctoral scholars in STEM and sustain biomedical innovation. Literature suggests that more effective mentorship models must move beyond traditional dyadic (one-on-one) structures focused solely on research support, to models that provide holistic guidance from a network of mentors across domains of research, career, and well-being. To foster this, we developed and piloted an 8-week program called SPNSOR (Structured Professional Networks for Successful Outcomes in Research). Grounded in both social network and social capital theory, SPNSOR responds to the increasing support for developmental network models, where trainees engage with multiple mentors to meet their holistic needs. Launched in January 2025, biomedical postdocs across New York State were randomized to two groups: an intervention group (n=9), which participated in weekly 1.5-hour virtual sessions over 8 weeks covering topics such as goal setting, assessing mentoring gaps, building new relationships, and navigating conflicts, or a control group (n=10), which received a single 2-hour workshop focused on optimizing their primary mentoring relationship. Initial results demonstrate high satisfaction, acceptability, and utility of the intervention (median score of 4.5/5). A focus group at 3 months will assess the perceived appropriateness of program length and format. Interviews with faculty and academic leaders will explore the feasibility of integrating SPNSOR into formal postdoctoral training programs. These early findings suggest that SPNSOR is a relevant, feasible and well-received intervention that addresses critical gaps in postdoctoral mentorship by fostering strategic, network-based support.

Indexed as

career outcomesmentoring programsMentor networkpostdoctoral scholarsSTEMM

Identifiers

PMID42326056
PMCPMC13278531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.