ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
The long journey of a retained guidewire, from vein to aorta leading to cardiac tamponade: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complete loss of a guidewire during central venous catheterization is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication and is considered a preventable 'never event.' Retained guidewires mostly recognized during or shortly after the procedure, some may be stay in vascular system for a long time without detection and are associated with wide range of complications including vascular and cardiac chamber perforation. The decision to remove the guidewire through surgical or percutaneous technique should follow an individualized approach based on its location, associated complications, and the patient's clinical condition. Case summary: A 61-year-old male presented with sharp chest and epigastric pain, initially raising suspicion of acute coronary syndrome. Chest X-ray and initial echocardiogram were unremarkable. Electrocardiogram findings and serial troponin measurements were inconclusive. During follow-up, the patient developed fever, elevated acute phase reactants, and abdominal tenderness. Given the atypical clinical presentation, emergent coronary angiography was deferred. Abdominal ultrasound showed no acute intra-abdominal pathology. Due to persistent fever and worsening abdominal symptoms, a computed tomography scan was obtained revealing a linear radiopaque object extending from the right femoral vein, perforating right atrium and ascending aorta with associated haemorrhagic pericardial effusion. Emergent surgery was performed, and guidewire was successfully removed. Retrospective imaging showed its unnoticed presence for almost nine years. Discussion: Although guidewire retention is well-documented, delayed diagnosis with major vascular injury is exceedingly rare. Existing literature highlights inadequate supervision and procedural distractions as leading contributors to guidewire retention. This case underscores the long-term risk and severe consequences of retained guidewire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.