Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326039›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026

The long journey of a retained guidewire, from vein to aorta leading to cardiac tamponade: a case report.

Hazal Ünlügenç, Bekir Serhat Yıldız, Emre Demir, Osman Nuri Tuncer, Oğuz Yavuzgil

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hazal ÜnlügençEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Kazımdirik Mah. Üniversite Cd. No: 9 Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı 35100, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-3001
Bekir Serhat YıldızEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Kazımdirik Mah. Üniversite Cd. No: 9 Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı 35100, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-0624
Emre DemirEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Kazımdirik Mah. Üniversite Cd. No: 9 Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı 35100, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-8967
Osman Nuri TuncerEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kazımdirik Mah. Üniversite Cd. No: 9 Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı 35100, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-1639
Oğuz YavuzgilEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Kazımdirik Mah. Üniversite Cd. No: 9 Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı 35100, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-6835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complete loss of a guidewire during central venous catheterization is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication and is considered a preventable 'never event.' Retained guidewires mostly recognized during or shortly after the procedure, some may be stay in vascular system for a long time without detection and are associated with wide range of complications including vascular and cardiac chamber perforation. The decision to remove the guidewire through surgical or percutaneous technique should follow an individualized approach based on its location, associated complications, and the patient's clinical condition. Case summary: A 61-year-old male presented with sharp chest and epigastric pain, initially raising suspicion of acute coronary syndrome. Chest X-ray and initial echocardiogram were unremarkable. Electrocardiogram findings and serial troponin measurements were inconclusive. During follow-up, the patient developed fever, elevated acute phase reactants, and abdominal tenderness. Given the atypical clinical presentation, emergent coronary angiography was deferred. Abdominal ultrasound showed no acute intra-abdominal pathology. Due to persistent fever and worsening abdominal symptoms, a computed tomography scan was obtained revealing a linear radiopaque object extending from the right femoral vein, perforating right atrium and ascending aorta with associated haemorrhagic pericardial effusion. Emergent surgery was performed, and guidewire was successfully removed. Retrospective imaging showed its unnoticed presence for almost nine years. Discussion: Although guidewire retention is well-documented, delayed diagnosis with major vascular injury is exceedingly rare. Existing literature highlights inadequate supervision and procedural distractions as leading contributors to guidewire retention. This case underscores the long-term risk and severe consequences of retained guidewire.

Indexed as

Aortic perforationCardiac tamponadeCase reportCentral venous catheterizationGuidewire retentionNever-event

Identifiers

PMID42326039
PMCPMC13281928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.