Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326022›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Uterocutaneous fistula following cesarean section: a case report.

Shahd Khatib, Nardeen Hammad, Shahd Al Aloul, Waleed Malhes, Ibaa Barghouthi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shahd Khatib *Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Nardeen Hammad *Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Shahd Al Aloul *Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Waleed Malhes *Palestine Medical Complex, Ramallah, Palestine.
Ibaa BarghouthiPalestine Medical Complex, Ramallah, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case report details the clinical journey of a 37-year-old woman, gravida 6 para 6 + 1, who presented with persistent purulent discharge from her cesarean section scar following an elective cesarean delivery. Her obstetric history included two uncomplicated vaginal deliveries and four cesarean sections, with significant complications in the previous pregnancies, including gestational diabetes and placenta previa. Notably, ultrasound findings during her most recent pregnancy raised concerns for placenta accreta spectrum. Despite a vertical midline incision for cesarean delivery and intraoperative findings confirming placenta accreta, the patient developed a chronic purulent discharge approximately two months post-surgery, resistant to multiple courses of antibiotics. Evaluation revealed a hypoechoic area and CT imaging suggested postoperative scarring. Pelvic MRI confirmed the diagnosis of a uterocutaneous fistula (UCF). Management initially involved antibiotic therapy; however, surgical intervention became necessary due to persistent symptoms. During surgery, extensive adhesions were identified, along with the fistulous tract. A total hysterectomy was performed without immediate complications, and the patient was discharged in stable condition within a week. This case underscores the complexities of managing postoperative complications in patients with significant obstetric histories and highlights the importance of multidisciplinary approaches in challenging surgical scenarios.

Indexed as

caesarean complicationsfistulagyneacological surgerygyne and obstetricsuterocutaneous fistula

Identifiers

PMID42326022
PMCPMC13275667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.