ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2026
"Bridging tradition and modern care: a narrative review on managing menopause in Saudi primary healthcare settings".
Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Menopause is a multifaceted biological, psychological, and social transition experienced by women worldwide. While global research describes variations in symptom prevalence and cultural interpretations, the Saudi context remains underexplored despite its unique cultural, religious, and social influences. Saudi women commonly report vasomotor, psychological, and musculoskeletal symptoms, yet intimate and urogenital concerns remain underreported due to cultural norms. Primary healthcare (PHC) services face documented gaps in training, readiness, and communication, further limiting comprehensive care for menopausal women. Objective: This narrative review examines the cultural, religious, psychological, and social dimensions of menopause among Saudi women, evaluates patient-provider interaction dynamics within PHC services, and highlights opportunities for integrating culturally appropriate management approaches. Methods: A narrative synthesis of national and international literature was conducted, drawing on studies related to menopausal symptoms, cultural perceptions, healthcare system readiness, traditional therapies, and patient-provider communication in Saudi Arabia. Results: Findings demonstrate that cultural and Islamic values strongly shape women's perceptions of menopause, coping strategies, and health-seeking behavior. Herbal and traditional remedies remain widely used, often preferred over hormone replacement therapy. Significant barriers affect PHC-level care, including limited provider training, gender dynamics influencing consultation comfort, lack of privacy, and the absence of national menopause management guidelines. Psychologically, many women experience mood changes, anxiety, and altered self-perception, while social factors-particularly family and marital dynamics-play a critical role in adjustment. Emerging community-based programs and telemedicine platforms offer promising culturally sensitive avenues to improve access and quality of care. Conclusion: Menopause among Saudi women is a complex biopsychosocial experience shaped by deep cultural and religious contexts. Current PHC services have notable gaps but also clear opportunities for improvement through clinical training, culturally competent communication, integration of safe traditional practices, and expansion of telemedicine. Developing national guidelines and community-based education initiatives is essential to enhance patient-centered, culturally congruent menopausal care in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.