Multimodal evidence and technology-enabled accommodations for autistic adults: an evidential framework for autism research and practice.

Autistic adults often face challenges to the legitimacy of their own neurology, in part because narrowly deficit-centric frameworks continue to privilege externally observed impairment over converging evidence from neuroscience, physiology, lived experience, and technology. This article proposes evidential pluralism - grounded in the Russo-Williamson thesis that causal inference in the health sciences requires the integration of difference-making and mechanistic evidence - as a framework for understanding autistic adulthood, extended here to encompass five distinct claim types: phenomenological, mechanistic, diagnostic, intervention, and ethical or policy. Drawing on converging but heterogeneous evidence from cognitive and sensory neuroscience, research on masking and mental health, gender and gender diversity, participatory methods, and wearable-technology studies, the paper considers how improved recognition of neurobiological diversity may have contributed to spectrum expansion, while acknowledging the parallel roles of diagnostic broadening, ascertainment effects, instrument drift, and sex and gender-related diagnostic bias. The paper explores how wearable and AI-enabled accommodation systems might, in principle, support autistic adults in real time and generate longitudinal physiological data, while emphasising the need for rigorous validation, independent replication, and robust privacy and data-governance safeguards. A dedicated section addresses the full heterogeneity of autistic adulthood, including adults with the highest support needs. The article closes by outlining implications for research design, clinical practice, and policy, framing accommodations as a matter of rights rather than discretionary privilege.