Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325933›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026

Distilling Knowledge in Gastroenterology: An Artificial Intelligence System for Assisting Colonoscopy and Pathology Report Review.

Brayden Mau, Sushil Kumar Garg, Sarah B Harper, Rahul Gomes, Alexandra Rolli, Rajeev Chaudhry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brayden MauDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI.
Sushil Kumar GargDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI.
Sarah B HarperAI and Bioinformatics, Mayo Clinic Health System, Rochester, MN.
Rahul GomesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI.
Alexandra RolliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI.
Rajeev ChaudhryAI and Bioinformatics, Mayo Clinic Health System, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop an efficient and domain-adapted system to process colonoscopy and pathology reports using knowledge distillation techniques. Patients and Methods: We implemented a knowledge distillation framework to create a smaller, domain-specific large language models-based natural language processing model for summarizing and extracting key information from clinical reports. The model was trained on a dataset consisting of 5500 colonoscopy reports and 7000 pathology reports taken from January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. Performance was evaluated against ground truth polyp categories derived from pathology report diagnoses. Results: The distilled model reported high domain-specific performance, achieving 95.2% accuracy (95% CI, 93.9%-96.5%), 0.95 precision, and a 31.5% improvement in inference speed relative to the teacher model. Despite being substantially smaller than the teacher model, it maintained strong capability in polyp category identification from key clinical factors, including polyp number, size, histology, and location across colonoscopy and pathology reports. Domain clinicians reported high agreement with model outputs across all 6 evaluated clinical questions, confirming its reliability for supporting follow-up recommendation workflows. Conclusion: This work presents a step toward making domain-specific natural language processing models for gastroenterology more efficient and scalable. By leveraging knowledge distillation, we report the potential for creating more practical domain-specific models that can assist in interpreting complex clinical documentation. Future work will focus on real-world validation and expanding the model to other procedural report types.

Identifiers

PMID42325933
PMCPMC13279145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.