ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026
Distilling Knowledge in Gastroenterology: An Artificial Intelligence System for Assisting Colonoscopy and Pathology Report Review.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an efficient and domain-adapted system to process colonoscopy and pathology reports using knowledge distillation techniques. Patients and Methods: We implemented a knowledge distillation framework to create a smaller, domain-specific large language models-based natural language processing model for summarizing and extracting key information from clinical reports. The model was trained on a dataset consisting of 5500 colonoscopy reports and 7000 pathology reports taken from January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. Performance was evaluated against ground truth polyp categories derived from pathology report diagnoses. Results: The distilled model reported high domain-specific performance, achieving 95.2% accuracy (95% CI, 93.9%-96.5%), 0.95 precision, and a 31.5% improvement in inference speed relative to the teacher model. Despite being substantially smaller than the teacher model, it maintained strong capability in polyp category identification from key clinical factors, including polyp number, size, histology, and location across colonoscopy and pathology reports. Domain clinicians reported high agreement with model outputs across all 6 evaluated clinical questions, confirming its reliability for supporting follow-up recommendation workflows. Conclusion: This work presents a step toward making domain-specific natural language processing models for gastroenterology more efficient and scalable. By leveraging knowledge distillation, we report the potential for creating more practical domain-specific models that can assist in interpreting complex clinical documentation. Future work will focus on real-world validation and expanding the model to other procedural report types.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.