Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325922›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2026

Construction and validation of a predictive model of pathological complete response combined with MRI and tumor indicators for HER2-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant targeted therapy.

Keying Zhu, Zeying Li, Jiaqian Liao, Changan Wang, Rong Guo, Yiyin Tang, Shaoqiang Zhou, Yingying Ding, Dedian Chen, Jiankui Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Keying ZhuYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Zeying LiYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Jiaqian LiaoYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Changan WangYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Rong GuoYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Yiyin TangYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Shaoqiang ZhouYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Yingying DingDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Dedian ChenYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Jiankui WangYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Jianyun NieYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.
Sheng HuangYunnan Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Centre, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650118, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate models for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are increasingly needed in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). In the present study, a nomogram was developed to estimate the probability of achieving a pCR in this population. Clinical data were retrospectively and prospectively collected from patients with HER2-positive BC at three time points: Before NAT, after the first cycle of neoadjuvant targeted therapy and after the completion of NAT before surgery. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of pCR, and these variables were used to construct a predictive model and corresponding nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using calibration curves, decision curve analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUC), with retrospective data and prospective data used for internal and external validations, respectively. Logistic regression analysis of the retrospective cohort identified eight predictors associated with pCR, which were incorporated into a concise nomogram. Internal validation demonstrated good calibration and strong predictive performance, with an AUC value of 0.886 (P<0.001), sensitivity of 0.822 and specificity of 0.818. External validation further confirmed the excellent discriminatory ability of the model, yielding an AUC value of 0.961 (P<0.001), sensitivity of 1.000 and specificity was 0.875. Overall, this nomogram, which integrates multiple clinically relevant factors, may serve as a useful tool for predicting post-NAT pCR in patients with HER2-positive BC and may support more precise treatment decision-making in clinical practice.

Indexed as

breast cancerHER2-positiveneoadjuvant therapy response evaluationnomogramprediction model

Identifiers

PMID42325922
PMCPMC13280528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.