In one paragraphArticle in PhytoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
6 authors.
Ling-Bo JiEcological and Environmental Science and Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences Guilin China https://ror.org/00ff97g12.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2005-021X Fang WenGuangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, 541006, Guangxi, China South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guangzhou China https://ror.org/01xqdxh54.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3889-8835 Xiu-Hui JinEcological and Environmental Science and Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences Guilin China https://ror.org/00ff97g12.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1484-6784 Yi-Da XuKey Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Plant Conservation and Utilization in Southern China, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China Key Laboratory of Ecological Environmental Damage Control and Value Transformation Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-4770 Bo-Heng LiYoung Naturalist (Hangzhou) Cultural Communication Limited Company, Hangzhou, 310012, China Young Naturalist (Hangzhou) Cultural Communication Limited Company Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8847-6883 Bo TangEcological and Environmental Science and Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences Guilin China https://ror.org/00ff97g12.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4918-5313 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Medicinal plantmorphologynew taxonOreocharis cotinifoliaOreocharis dayaoshanioidestaxonomy
Identifiers
PMID42325871
PMCPMC13282631
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390