ReviewGynecologic oncology reports2026
Vaginal dilator therapy for pelvic cancer patients: a review.
Review in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vulvovaginal atrophy affects up to 84% of postmenopausal women and is even more prevalent among cancer survivors. Hypoestrogenism leads to thinning of vaginal epithelium, decreased elasticity, reduced lubrication, and increased tissue fragility, resulting in symptoms such as vaginal dryness, irritation, dyspareunia, and pain with pelvic examination. Cancer treatments-including chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, pelvic radiation, and gynecologic surgery-can induce abrupt estrogen deficiency and accelerate vulvovaginal atrophy beyond what seen in natural menopause. Pelvic radiation in particular is associated with long-term vaginal toxicity, including fibrosis, shortening, and stenosis, which may impair sexual function and limit adequate pelvic examination. Rates of clinically significant vaginal stenosis after chemoradiation for cervical cancer may exceed 30% without preventive intervention. Vaginal dilator therapy is a commonly recommended non-hormonal strategy intended to mechanically stretch vaginal tissues, prevent adhesions, and maintain vaginal patency following cancer treatment. Dilators are cylindrical devices available in multiple sizes and materials, with gradual progression in size recommended to improve vaginal elasticity and tolerance. Lubricants-preferably water-based and physiologically compatible in pH and osmolality-are essential to reduce friction and improve comfort during use. Prospective evidence, although limited, suggests vaginal dilator therapy may reduce the severity of vaginal stenosis. Randomized and observational studies demonstrate decreased stenosis progression, improved dilator tolerance, and better sexual function when therapy is initiated early and used consistently. However, adherence remains a major barrier, with many patients unable to maintain recommended frequency of use. Improved patient education, early access to dilators, and supportive follow-up may enhance adherence and therapeutic benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.