ArticleSurgery open science2026
Preoperative planning software as a digital health tool in orthopedics: Surgeon-reported benefits in shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/hypothesis: Preoperative planning software has gained traction in shoulder arthroplasty, enabling surgeons to better visualize patient's anatomy and optimize implant positioning. Widespread adoption of such tools depends not only on their efficacy but also on surgeon satisfaction and perceived utility in day-to-day practice. However, data on surgeons' satisfaction and perceived utility of such software remain limited. This survey aimed to evaluate surgeons' overall satisfaction, perception and the willingness to recommend the software as a training tool for fellows. Materials and methods: A retrospective observational survey was conducted to evaluate overall satisfaction and usage patterns among orthopedic surgeons using pre-operative 3D planning software (Blueprint®). All surgeons were contacted via email with a web-based questionnaire. Reponses were analyzed with descriptive statistics to assess overall surgeon satisfaction, level of agreement with predefined statements, likelihood of future use and willingness to recommend the software to others. Results: The web-based questionnaire was distributed to 1100 orthopedic surgeons between September 30, 2024, and November 11, 2024. 312 responses were received, of which 273 were evaluable responses. Most respondents were low-volume or medium-volume surgeons, and high-volume surgeons were underrepresented (<7.7%). 270 responses were collected from surgeons evaluating their overall satisfaction, with 97% of the feedback being positive. 96% of surgeons said the planning software boosted their confidence in their preoperative plan and 33% during surgery, and 86% reported lower stress compared to performing the procedure without it. Conclusions: This survey suggests that pre-operative 3D planning software (Blueprint®) is a well-received digital solution in shoulder arthroplasty, with perceived benefits regarding surgical planning, surgeon's stress level, confidence and training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.