ReviewBurns & trauma2026
Advances in hemostatic biomaterials: biomimetic strategies, nanotechnology, and smart therapeutics.
Review in Burns & trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bleeding, a critical complication in trauma, surgery, and conditions such as hemophilia, liver cirrhosis, and thrombocytopenia, often leads to shock or death. The limitations of traditional hemostatic methods-such as compression, suturing, and electrocautery-have prompted the development of advanced biomaterials. In modern research, intelligent, multi-mechanism systems have supplanted basic physical or chemical approaches. Biomimetic designs, such as platelet- and fibrin-inspired materials, alongside nanotechnology (e.g. nanoparticle carriers and electrospun fibers) and stimuli-responsive polymers (e.g. light- or temperature-triggered), enable targeted clotting, controlled drug release, and enhanced wound adhesion. Additionally, 3D printing and microfluidics allow precise material modification, further boosting hemostatic efficiency. Despite these advances, clinical translation faces challenges related to biocompatibility, mass production, and patient-specific customization. Future progress is likely to integrate multidisciplinary technologies, such as artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, smart regulation, and personalized therapies, to improve hemorrhage management. These innovations aim to bridge the gap between laboratory research and clinical application, offering safer, more effective solutions for trauma and surgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.