ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026
Diagnostic performance of multimodal imaging integrating X-ray, CT, and MRI in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of combined X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome and its subtypes, and to explore potential factors associated with FAI.
methodsA total of 86 patients with FAI syndrome (FAI group) and 70 individuals without hip joint abnormalities (control group) were retrospectively enrolled. All participants underwent X-ray, CT, and MRI examinations. The imaging findings were collected and analyzed. The diagnostic performance of each modality and their combination for FAI syndrome was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Subsequently, independent risk factors were identified, and a nomogram prediction model was built and validated.
resultsThe area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnosing FAI syndrome using X-ray, CT, and MRI was 0.792, 0.845, and 0.889, respectively, whereas the combined diagnostic model achieved an AUC of 0.932 (specificity: 90.70%, sensitivity: 95.71%, accuracy: 92.95%). Multivariate analysis further identified age, high-intensity exercise history (Hx_HIE), α angle, and center-edge (CE) angle as independent risk factors for FAI syndrome, while femoral offset played a protective role. The constructed nomogram demonstrated excellent predictive performance, with a C-index of 0.966 and high calibration accuracy, particularly in the high-risk range.
conclusionThe joint screening using X-ray, CT, and MRI can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy for FAI syndrome. Age ≥32 years, a history of high-intensity exercise, increased α/CE angles, and decreased femoral offset are associated with a higher risk of developing FAI syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.