ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026
Traumatic elbow stiffness: pathogenic spectrum and comparative outcomes of minimally invasive versus open release surgery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the predominant pathogenic factors in traumatic elbow stiffness (TES) and to compare functional outcomes between minimally invasive and open release surgery.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 120 patients with TES who were admitted to the HEBEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY THIRD HOSPITAL between June 2023 and December 2025. Of these, 60 underwent minimally invasive release surgery and 60 underwent open release surgery. Pathogenic causes were determined via preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings. Range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and SF-36 were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months.
resultsLigamentous contracture (91.7%) and heterotopic ossification (80.0%) were the two most common pathologies. The minimally invasive group achieved significantly higher total effectiveness rate (95.0% vs. 83.3%, χ
conclusionLigamentous contracture and heterotopic ossification constitute the main treatable targets in TES. Compared with open release surgery, minimally invasive surgery yields better early functional recovery, likely due to reduced iatrogenic trauma and faster rehabilitation. These findings support minimally invasive release surgery as a preferred option for appropriate TES candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.