ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026
Development and validation of a multidimensional machine-learning model to predict clinically significant immune-related adverse events in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo overcome the limitations of existing predictors for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including failure to account for competing mortality risks and non-linear interactions, we aimed to develop an accurate machine learning model for clinically significant irAEs (cs-irAEs, Grade ≥ 2).
methodsWe enrolled 332 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and randomly assigned to training (n = 232) and testing (n = 100) sets. The Fine-Gray model, adjusting for death as a competing event, estimated cs-irAE incidence. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression selected predictors, followed by an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model compared to logistic regression. Model performance was assessed using under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values for interpretability.
resultsThe 12-month cumulative incidence of cs-irAEs was 18.0% (95% CI, 14.0%-23.0%). Nine predictors were selected, including baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), body mass index, prior radiotherapy, and proton pump inhibitor use. The XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.805-0.937) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.9% in the testing set. SHAP analysis revealed a non-linear protective threshold for NLR > 4.0. A bedside nomogram was created using the six strongest predictors.
conclusionThis machine learning-based model accurately identified advanced NSCLC patients at risk for cs-irAEs. Its high NPV value helped identify low-risk patients, supporting optimized monitoring and resource allocation. Combining competing risk analysis with interpretable machine learning offers a stable tool for personalized toxicity management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.