ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Comparative Study of Peri-Implant Tissues Following Flapless Placement of a One-Piece Tissue-Level Implant Versus Open-Flap Placement of a Two-Piece Bone-Level Implant in a Canine Model.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Study of Peri-Implant Tissues Following Flapless Placement of a One-Piece Tissue-Level Implant Versus Open-Flap Placement of a Two-Piece Bone-Level Implant in a Canine Model.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the placement of a minimally invasive implant (MII, one-piece tissue-level implant) using a flapless/subcrestal protocol provides a better quality of peri-implant tissues compared to a reference implant (RI, two-piece bone-level implant) placed with an open-flap/crestal protocol in a canine model. Methods: In this in vivo preclinical study, two types of implants were placed in the mandibula. Clinical, radiological, and histomorphometry measurements were performed at implant placement (T0), at healing abutment placement (T + 8W), and at the end of the study (T + 16W). Results: Three osseointegration failures occurred, all in the MII group, reducing sample sizes for that group. A significant increase in keratinized tissue height was observed around the MII (3.00 mm ± 1.04 vs 3.68 mm ± 0.63; Conclusion: In this canine model and under the specific study conditions, the MII was associated with distinct patterns of bone remodeling and greater epithelial-connective tissue dimensions in mesiodistal sections. These results suggest a favorable soft tissue environment around the MII. It would be interesting to confirm these results in humans, particularly the elderly and medically compromised patients for whom the atraumatic flapless surgical protocol seems particularly suitable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.