ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Interpretable detection of left ventricular hypertrophy using commercial ECG features and machine learning: a study based on the PTB-XL+ dataset.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. ECG is the most accessible LVH screening tool, but conventional voltage criteria have low sensitivity. Deep learning improves detection but lacks interpretability. This study aims to evaluate the utility of PTB-XL+ pre-extracted commercial ECG features for interpretable LVH detection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 11,692 PTB-XL+ ECG records (2,258 LVH, 9,434 normal). Three feature sets (GE 12SL:782, UNIG:702, ECGDeli:529) and four classifiers (XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, Logistic Regression) were evaluated via five-fold stratified cross-validation. SHAP analysis provided feature importance interpretations. Results: XGBoost performed best (AUC: 12SL = 0.9859, UNIG = 0.9853, ECGDeli = 0.9828). Commercial features marginally outperformed open-source ECGDeli. SHAP identified key features (V5-V6T-wave changes, precordial R-wave amplitude, V1 QRS area) and age as an important non-ECG predictor. Conclusion: Interpretable machine learning (ML) with commercial ECG features achieves excellent LVH detection with clinically meaningful attributions, bridging high performance and interpretability for clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.