ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Timing of Bronchoscopy and Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in Immunocompromised Host Pneumonia.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunocompromised patients are at high risk of pneumonia, with associated poor outcomes. Rapid microbiologic diagnosis is crucial, yet diagnostic yields vary widely. We evaluated the variability in diagnostic yield of usual care testing and plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing in the prospective observational Pneumonia in the Immunocompromised-Use of the Karius Test for the Detection of Undiagnosed Pathogens (PICKUP) study, specifically focusing on timing of testing relative to the onset of pneumonia. Methods: In this exploratory analysis, patient characteristics, variability in diagnostic yield, and the timing of bronchoscopy and mcfDNA sequencing from date of first abnormal imaging associated with suspected pneumonia were evaluated across enrolling sites. Results: A total of 222 patients from 10 enrolling sites were analyzed. Usual care diagnostic yield varied across sites (range, 7.7%-57.7%). Patient characteristics did not differ between sites, and median time from abnormal imaging to bronchoscopy was not different across sites (3 days [IQR, 3]). Diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy was significantly higher when performed ≤3 days (early) from abnormal imaging (38.5% [52/135]) versus >3 days (delayed) (21.8% [19/87]) (difference, 16.7% [95% CI, 2.5%-28.3%]; Conclusions: Early bronchoscopy enhances diagnostic yield in immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. Irrespective of timing, plasma mcfDNA sequencing increases overall diagnostic yield in this clinical scenario. These findings underscore the importance of prompt diagnostic strategies in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.