ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
A WEb-Accessible comprehensiVE platform for automatic vestibular schwannoma segmentation and longitudinal volumetric tracking.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) require long-term tracking for treatment decisions and outcome assessment. This study aims to develop a WEb-Accessible comprehensiVE (WEAVE) platform that combines AI-driven segmentation with a user-friendly interface to enable longitudinal volume tracking for disease assessment, planning, and monitoring. Methods: WEAVE was built using nnU-Net as the backbone for auto-segmentation, with 3 models trained and validated on combinations of various image modalities. Auto-segmentation performance was evaluated with multiple metrics including absolute and relative volume differences (AVD/RVD), Dice score, mean surface-to-surface distance, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). The platform features a central database with DICOM-RT import/export capabilities, and its interface is built using Rust and WebAssembly. Results: Three models demonstrated comparable performance without significant differences with mean Dice scores, AVD, and RVD ranged from (0.89 to 0.90), (0.11 to 0.13 cc), and (10.70% to 13.44%), respectively. Mean surface-to-surface distance and HD95 values were consistently low (0.14-0.19 and 0.74-0.88 mm, respectively). Average inference time was ∼60 s per case. The platform successfully enabled longitudinal tumor volume tracking and provided flexible visualization options, including single and multiple image views and a graphical representation of volume changes over time. Conclusions: WEAVE is a comprehensive platform that combines automated segmentation with longitudinal tracking to support VS management. The AI models achieved Dice scores comparable to interobserver variability in manual contouring, indicating clinical adequacy. The tracking capability provides consistency in treatment planning and monitoring and opens the possibility to advance AI-driven segmentation and streamline workflows for other intracranial pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.