ReviewWellbeing, space and society2026
Understanding the nature-wellbeing relationship in adults: a qualitative metasynthesis review.
Review in Wellbeing, space and society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The natural environment is increasingly acknowledged as an important factor for influencing human health and wellbeing, with growing agreement among policymakers, researchers, and practitioners of its benefits. While nature access and quality are important considerations, wellbeing benefits may be more closely linked to individuals' perceptions as opposed to the environmental characteristics. Due to a complex of personal and socio-cultural factors influencing the nature-wellbeing relationship, traditional linear models may not be sensitive enough to explore the nuanced, context dependent processes of how people relate to nature. To address this gap, we carried out a qualitative metasynthesis review of 49 studies exploring how direct experiences of living nature can impact human wellbeing for adults. Through iteration, interpretation and critique, the findings were organised into a theoretical framework. The review provides deeper and more nuanced understandings of the nature-wellbeing relationship than existing pathway models by unpacking how therapeutic nature encounters are formed through embodied sense-making, shifting attention from objective exposure to subjective experience. Findings highlight the importance of how we relate to nature through multisensory experiences and attunement. The review also demonstrates that the diverse wellbeing outcomes people experience from nature, both hedonic and eudemonic, can only be fully understood by acknowledging how individuals make meaning from their lived experiences, recognising that emotion-laden interpretation is central to human nature. The findings have both theoretical and practical relevance, highlighting the importance of: integrating experimental and more tacit forms of knowledge; relational values; and person-centred approaches to designing nature programmes and spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.