Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325601›Full record

ReviewWellbeing, space and society2026

Understanding the nature-wellbeing relationship in adults: a qualitative metasynthesis review.

Jennifer E van Bekkum, Craig W McDougall, Charlotte Wendelboe-Nelson, Samantha S Mason, Andrew James Williams, Ruth Jepson, Stephen Malden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wellbeing, space and society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer E van BekkumScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Craig W McDougallScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Charlotte Wendelboe-NelsonOPENspace Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Samantha S MasonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew James WilliamsScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Ruth JepsonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Stephen MaldenScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural environment is increasingly acknowledged as an important factor for influencing human health and wellbeing, with growing agreement among policymakers, researchers, and practitioners of its benefits. While nature access and quality are important considerations, wellbeing benefits may be more closely linked to individuals' perceptions as opposed to the environmental characteristics. Due to a complex of personal and socio-cultural factors influencing the nature-wellbeing relationship, traditional linear models may not be sensitive enough to explore the nuanced, context dependent processes of how people relate to nature. To address this gap, we carried out a qualitative metasynthesis review of 49 studies exploring how direct experiences of living nature can impact human wellbeing for adults. Through iteration, interpretation and critique, the findings were organised into a theoretical framework. The review provides deeper and more nuanced understandings of the nature-wellbeing relationship than existing pathway models by unpacking how therapeutic nature encounters are formed through embodied sense-making, shifting attention from objective exposure to subjective experience. Findings highlight the importance of how we relate to nature through multisensory experiences and attunement. The review also demonstrates that the diverse wellbeing outcomes people experience from nature, both hedonic and eudemonic, can only be fully understood by acknowledging how individuals make meaning from their lived experiences, recognising that emotion-laden interpretation is central to human nature. The findings have both theoretical and practical relevance, highlighting the importance of: integrating experimental and more tacit forms of knowledge; relational values; and person-centred approaches to designing nature programmes and spaces.

Indexed as

GreenspaceHealth promotionMetasynthesisNatureQualitativeRelationshipReviewWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42325601
PMCPMC13275795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.