ArticleOpen access rheumatology : research and reviews2026
Real-World Effectiveness of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Multicenter Study from Rheumatoid Arthritis Saudi Database (RASD).
Article in Open access rheumatology : research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06417138 (Comparative Effectiveness of Different Drugs Used to Treat Patients in Rheumatoid Arthritis Saudi Database), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Different Drugs Used to Treat Patients in Rheumatoid Arthritis Saudi Database (RASD) The Primary Objective of This Study is to Compare the Effectiveness of Different Biological Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) and Targeted Synthetic (tsDMARDs) Using DAS-28-CRP and CDAI Scores.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management emphasizes treat-to-target strategies with timely escalation from conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) to biologic (bDMARDs) or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) when remission or low disease activity is not achieved. Comparative real-world effectiveness evidence across advanced therapies remains limited in some settings. To compare 12-month outcomes and treatment persistence across biologic (bDMARD) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) in Saudi patients enrolled in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Saudi Database (RASD). Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study of RASD patients receiving biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and assessments at baseline, 3-6 months, and 12 months. Outcomes included longitudinal DAS28-CRP change, 12-month disease activity, function, fatigue, remission, and treatment persistence through 36 months. Analyses used mixed-effects, covariate-adjusted regression, ordinal regression, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier methods, as appropriate for each outcome. Results: We analyzed 647 treatment courses across nine advanced therapies. Disease activity improved significantly over time, with a strong overall DAS28-CRP time effect (p<0.0001), but no significant overall drug effect (p=0.327) or time-by-drug interaction (p=0.218). Model-estimated 12-month DAS28-CRP values were closely clustered across therapies, with overlapping confidence intervals and no significant pairwise differences. In adjusted 12-month analyses, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, fatigue severity, and remission were comparable across agents. Most adjusted between-drug comparisons were non-significant, except for worse HAQ category with certolizumab compared with tofacitinib (adjusted OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.12-5.37). Remission varied significantly across participating centers. Discontinuation rates were low, most commonly due to lack of efficacy, and treatment persistence did not differ significantly across therapies through 36 months (log-rank p=0.17). Conclusion: Advanced RA therapies were associated with significant disease activity improvement and minimal adjusted between-drug differences. Except for an isolated worse HAQ signal with certolizumab versus tofacitinib, outcomes were broadly comparable across agents. Center-level remission variation highlights the importance of standardized treat-to-target implementation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06417138.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.