ArticleiScience2026
HS-QFNet: Deep learning-enhanced hyperspectral fluorescence correction for accurate
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate quantification of photosensitizer concentration is essential for effective fluorescence-guided surgery and personalized photodynamic therapy, but it is hindered by tissue-induced fluorescence distortions because existing correction methods have limited accuracy and clinical adaptability. We present a deep-learning-based fluorescence correction algorithm (Hyperspectral Quantitative Fluorescence Network [HS-QFNet]) that integrates hyperspectral fluorescence and diffuse reflectance image features from a phantom array with broad optical properties, combined with an attention mechanism to model nonlinear relationships between signal distortion and tissue optical properties, enabling precise detection of photosensitizer spatial distribution. Validated in phantoms, it achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.21 μM-a 68% improvement over traditional methods (0.65 μM MAE). In mouse tumor models, it maintained an MAE of 0.31 μM with a 0.957 correlation to true concentration. This advancement in quantitative fluorescence imaging holds significant value for tumor margin delineation and personalized therapy in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.