Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325557›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

HS-QFNet: Deep learning-enhanced hyperspectral fluorescence correction for accurate

Shuaikang Hao, Xinpeng Zhang, Yuehui Xu, Songlin Han, Xiwan Zhang, Haixia Qiu, Ying Gu, Defu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuaikang HaoSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Xinpeng ZhangSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Yuehui XuSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Songlin HanSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Xiwan ZhangSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Haixia QiuDepartment of Laser Medicine, First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Ying GuSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Defu ChenSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate quantification of photosensitizer concentration is essential for effective fluorescence-guided surgery and personalized photodynamic therapy, but it is hindered by tissue-induced fluorescence distortions because existing correction methods have limited accuracy and clinical adaptability. We present a deep-learning-based fluorescence correction algorithm (Hyperspectral Quantitative Fluorescence Network [HS-QFNet]) that integrates hyperspectral fluorescence and diffuse reflectance image features from a phantom array with broad optical properties, combined with an attention mechanism to model nonlinear relationships between signal distortion and tissue optical properties, enabling precise detection of photosensitizer spatial distribution. Validated in phantoms, it achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.21 μM-a 68% improvement over traditional methods (0.65 μM MAE). In mouse tumor models, it maintained an MAE of 0.31 μM with a 0.957 correlation to true concentration. This advancement in quantitative fluorescence imaging holds significant value for tumor margin delineation and personalized therapy in precision oncology.

Indexed as

Applied sciencesBiomedical disciplineMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42325557
PMCPMC13276451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.