Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325554›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Emerging hotspots of groundwater conflicts during droughts in Germany.

Jan Sodoge, Christian Kuhlicke, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Jan H Fleckenstein, Pia Ebeling, Mariana Madruga de Brito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jan SodogeDepartment of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany.
Christian KuhlickeDepartment of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany.
Giuliano Di BaldassarreDepartment of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jan H FleckensteinDepartment of Hydrogeology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany.
Pia EbelingDepartment of Hydrogeology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany.
Mariana Madruga de BritoDepartment of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groundwater conflicts are increasing worldwide, particularly during droughts. While conflict dynamics have been widely studied in historically water-scarce regions, emerging hotspots in Europe remain understudied. We introduce a text-mining approach to monitor conflicts over time and apply it to Germany, where droughts have exacerbated tensions among water users. Using a corpus of over 12,000 news articles published between 2000 and 2022, we map the spatiotemporal distribution of reported conflicts and identify their drivers using a metric of reported conflict intensity combining frequency and prominence of conflict reporting. Groundwater conflicts are geographically widespread, with recurring hotspots and new conflict areas emerging during the 2018-2022 multi-year drought. While water pollution and environmental protection have diminished in importance, scarcity, agriculture, and drought have become key drivers. Reported conflicts show only moderate spatial correlations with groundwater withdrawal, recharge, and pollution, suggesting media dynamics and social context shape which conflicts become publicly visible.

Indexed as

earth sciencesenvironmental monitoringenvironmental science

Identifiers

PMID42325554
PMCPMC13276450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.