ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Integrated Plastic Surgery Match Trends After Step 1 Pass/Fail Implementation: Data Analysis and Literature Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Integrated plastic surgery (IPS) programs are competitive. The conversion of Step 1 to pass/fail has altered the landscape for how applications are evaluated, leaving uncertainties for prospective applicants. This analysis identifies valuable applicant factors through trends from recent match cycles and the literature. Methods: A cross-sectional study of National Residency Matching Program data from 2020 to 2024 was performed. Aspects of IPS applications were compared among matched and unmatched seniors with a medical degree, osteopathic medicine degree, and international medical graduates. A literature review using the PubMed database was performed. Results: The number of IPS positions available and applications submitted have increased proportionally, resulting in a stable ratio from 2020 to 2024. The average Step 2 score of matched applicants differed only by a single point before and after the transition of Step 1 to pass/fail. Applicants with more publications and presentations, Alpha Omega Alpha honors, and degrees from a medical school designated with the highest National Institutes of Health funding had higher match success. Subjective factors identified as important included away rotations, interviews, and letters of recommendation. Conclusions: IPS remains competitive with applicants outnumbering available positions. Step 2 scores are an important objective measure; however, the average score of matched individuals has not increased since the elimination of Step 1 scores. Additional important aspects weighed by program directors are research publications and presentations, strong letters of recommendation, good performance on away rotations, and high-quality interviews.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.