Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325483›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Management of Asymptomatic Breast Implant Rupture in Older Adult Patients: A Scoping Review, Discussion, and Recommendations.

Nicholas A Vernice, Carter J Boyd, Kshipra Hemal, Chris Amro, Thomas J Sorenson, Jenn Park, Nolan S Karp, Oriana Cohen, Mihye Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas A VerniceFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Carter J BoydFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Kshipra HemalFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Chris AmroFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Thomas J SorensonFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Jenn ParkFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Nolan S KarpFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Oriana CohenFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Mihye ChoiFrom the Hansjӧrg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast implants are a fundamental adjunct in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, with more than 3.5 million recipients in the United States. Implant rupture risk increases with device age, although modern cohesive silicone implants demonstrate markedly improved durability. The Food and Drug Administration does not mandate routine replacement, but recommends surveillance screening for silicone implant rupture beginning 5-6 years postplacement and every 2-3 years thereafter. However, no guidelines exist for managing asymptomatic ruptures in older adult patients. A scoping review was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through January 2025 for guidelines on the management of asymptomatic implant rupture in older adult patients; none was identified. Evidence indicates that although surveillance can detect silent ruptures and minimize silicone migration, the clinical impact in older adult patients is limited given the low incidence of symptomatic complications with modern devices and reduced life expectancy. Risks of surveillance include false positives, overdiagnosis, patient anxiety, and unnecessary surgery-particularly relevant in older patients with higher perioperative complication rates. The authors propose discontinuing surveillance for asymptomatic silicone implants after age 75 years and foregoing routine implant exchange. In asymptomatic patients older than 75 with known or suspected rupture, observation is reasonable unless symptoms develop. Symptomatic cases should undergo diagnostic imaging and individualized risk-benefit discussion using a comprehensive geriatric assessment framework. A shared decision-making approach is emphasized, balancing surgical risks, patient comfort with uncertainty, and aesthetic concerns. These recommendations aim to optimize quality of life and avoid overtreatment in older adult patients with breast implants.

Identifiers

PMID42325483
PMCPMC13282052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.