ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2026
Accuracy of Quantifying Hypotension During Surgery Using Physiological Sensor Data.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDuring surgery it is common to measure the arterial blood pressure. One important reason is to monitor for hypotension, a too low blood pressure, which is known to be harmful. Since post-surgical complications correlate with hypotension, it is common to calculate the number of hypotensive events, their cumulative length, or their cumulative area under threshold. To make the data collection process manageable, parameter data is often stored only once every 15 seconds and then used to derive the amount of hypotension. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In this study, we calculate the errors introduced in quantizing hypotension based on different amount of downsampling from 419 surgical patients at the open abdomen surgery unit at Karolinska University Hospital. Experiments with error mitigation are also tested. Results are compared with using the continuous blood pressure waveform data.
resultsFor a downsampling to once every 15 seconds, the relative bias was 27.0% for the number of hypotensive events, 30.0% for the cumulative hypotensive length, and 10.8% for the cumulative area under threshold. Error mitigation approaches often do not improve the errors.
conclusionThese results highlight the necessity of using high frequency data and that it is important to be aware of the errors when interpreting older studies involving quantification of hypotension and based on downsampled data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.