ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026
Breaking down barriers: A qualitative study of demand- and supply-side barriers to depression care in Nepal.
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite global initiatives like WHO's mhGAP, mental health treatment gaps remain substantial, especially in LMICs. Barriers are often presented collectively, with an emphasis on supply-side solutions, while demand-side factors are frequently overlooked. Distinguishing these barriers and implementing tailored strategies is critical for improving access and utilization. This study explores stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of demand- and supply-side barriers to mental healthcare in Nepal. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 65 community stakeholders, including people with lived experience, using vignettes and the McGill Illness Narrative Interview (MINI) guide. Data were analyzed thematically in NVivo and interpreted through Levesque et al.'s access framework, which examines health system characteristics and individual capabilities. Demand-side barriers included spiritual attributions of mental illness, stigma, low perceived need, financial hardship, lack of family support and limited awareness of conditions and available services. These factors hindered recognition, help-seeking, affordability and engagement. Supply-side barriers involved frequent staff transfers, inadequate training, lack of privacy, poor infrastructure and irregular psychotropic medicine supply, affecting service acceptability, availability and appropriateness. Access to mental healthcare in Nepal is shaped by interconnected demand- and supply-side barriers. Addressing these requires culturally sensitive stigma-reduction, mental health literacy programs, workforce stabilization, reliable medication supply, privacy-friendly facilities and financial protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.