ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026
Essential Yet Invisible: Professional Identity Formation Among Academic Internal Medicine Hospitalists.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Academic Hospitalists (AHs) in internal medicine who are practicing in the United States (U.S.), are physicians whose inpatient clinical work is integrated with teaching, quality improvement, and research. Over 90% of US and Canada internal medicine programs rely on AHs as primary inpatient teaching attendings for medical students and residents. However, AH experience disproportionate burnout despite younger career stage, suggesting that structural and identity-related factors beyond typical career progression may drive dissatisfaction. This study explores how AHs construct their professional identity and how they view their role in the academic enterprise. Methods: Using identity theory as a conceptual framework this constructivist qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 20 academic hospitalists across nine U.S. academic institutions during 2024-2025, selected using information power sampling to ensure sufficient data depth. Interviews explored professional roles, identity within those roles, and identity formation across distinct domains. Transcripts were coded and analyzed iteratively using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results: Four interconnected themes were identified reflecting identity ambiguity, role strain, developmental needs, and recognition gaps among academic hospitalists: (1) the absence of consensus: defining what it means to be an Academic Hospitalist; (2) identity non-verification: the mismatch between self-perception and external recognition; (3) competing responsibilities, tensions, and burnout; and (4) mentorship and professional growth. Conclusion: AHs construct identity amid structural ambiguity and institutional non-recognition of salient professional roles. Institutions should clarify role expectations, provide non-negotiable protected time for academic engagement, establish robust mentorship infrastructure, and formally recognize educational contributions through performance metrics and compensation structures. These systemic changes are essential for supporting professional identity formation, enhancing career satisfaction, improving retention, and strengthening academic medicine's educational mission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.