Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325415›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for postoperative atrial fibrillation after lung cancer surgery: a machine-learning-based study.

Yi Xu, Ting Lu, Ke Xu, Xiaoyan Feng, Rongsheng Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi Xu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (The Second People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region), Guilin, China.
Ting Lu *Department of Community Health, Pusat Kanser Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang, Malaysia.
Ke XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (The Second People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region), Guilin, China.
Xiaoyan FengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (The Second People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region), Guilin, China.
Rongsheng XiongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (The Second People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region), Guilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after lung cancer surgery, associated with increased morbidity and prolonged hospitalisation. Accurate preoperative or early postoperative risk stratification remains challenging due to the multifactorial nature of POAF. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning-based prediction models for POAF and to construct a clinically applicable nomogram for individualised risk estimation. Methods: A total of 540 patients undergoing lung cancer surgery were retrospectively included, among whom 107 (19.8%) developed POAF. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort ( Results: LASSO regression identified six predictors of POAF: age, education level, hypertension, marital status, postoperative pain score, and surgical approach. In the training cohort, all models demonstrated good discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.827 to 0.995. However, performance declined to varying degrees in the test cohort. LR exhibited the most stable performance, achieving the highest AUC (0.855) and accuracy (0.857), with acceptable precision (0.667), recall (0.563), and F1 score (0.610). Calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed POAF risks for the LR model, while decision curve analysis demonstrated a consistently favourable net benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Based on these findings, an LR-based nomogram incorporating the six selected predictors was developed to facilitate individualised POAF risk prediction. Conclusions: We developed and internally validated a machine learning-assisted risk prediction framework for POAF after lung cancer surgery. Compared with more complex models, LR demonstrated superior stability, calibration, and clinical utility. The resulting nomogram provides a practical and interpretable tool for early postoperative POAF risk assessment and may support perioperative monitoring and personalised management of patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

Indexed as

logistic regressionlung cancer surgerymachine learningnomogrampostoperative atrial fibrillationrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42325415
PMCPMC13275363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.