ArticleInternet interventions2026
The impact of a national transition of treatment platform on the acceptance of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy: A longitudinal study among Norwegian therapists.
Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Therapists' acceptance of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) is critical for successful and sustained implementation. However, little is known about how acceptance is affected by changes in delivery platforms. Objective: To investigate how therapists' acceptance of iCBT changes during a national transition to a new delivery platform. Methods: During a national change in delivery platform, 46 therapists (69% of the national population; N = 67) providing iCBT in Norwegian specialist health services, completed questionnaires at five time points over 18 months. The study applied an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) which accounted for both patients and therapists as users of iCBT. Measures included TAM constructs, individual characteristics and place of employment. Multilevel models assessed changes in acceptance over time and baseline variance at therapist and organizational levels. Results: Overall acceptance of iCBT was high at baseline and remained largely stable throughout the transition. Therapist perception of patients' ease of use increased significantly over time and was clearly distinguished from their perception of their own user experience. Notably, therapists' acceptance of the new platform was high even before they had gained hands-on user experience. Conclusion: Among experienced iCBT therapists', acceptance appears resilient to disruptions caused by changes in treatment platforms. Acceptance of a new platform is not dependent on positive user experience alone and may be affected by efforts that influence therapists' expectations before implementation. Therapists' perceptions of their patients' user experience are likely important for their acceptance but remain poorly understood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.