Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325358›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Learning from video tutorials: mental focusing and rehearsal are just as effective as written focusing.

Simon A Schriek, Kirsten Berthold, Markus H Hefter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon A SchriekDepartment of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Kirsten BertholdDepartment of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Markus H HefterDepartment of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Learning with video tutorials has grown in popularity during the last years. Taking recourse to video tutorials enables learners to learn at their own convenience. Yet without the presence of instructors, learners need to self-regulate their learning process which novices in particular find overwhelming. Focus prompts can support learners to do this. While answers to such prompts are usually entered via a keyboard, the growing use of immersive technologies demands for prompts that do not rely on text entries. Methods: In this study, we compared a written focus condition (written answers to prompts) with a mental focus condition (creating a mental list), a mental rehearsal condition (performing actions before the inner eye) and a control condition without instructional support in a sample of 117 university students. We used industrial original video tutorials in our study. Results: We did not find any differences between the various conditions with regard to learning engagement, learning outcomes, and instructional efficiency (i.e., relative efficiency combining learning outcomes and cognitive load) but differences in learning time: participants in the written focus condition needed more time to respond to the prompts. Discussion: We attribute the lack differences in learning engagement and outcomes to the well-designed learning environment and the highly controlled laboratory setting. Our findings show that it is possible to learn with video tutorials without responding to prompts in written form and implicate that learners' time and cognitive resources should be saved when the learning material is sufficient.

Indexed as

cognitive loadfocused processingmental rehearsalpromptsself-regulated learningvideo tutorials

Identifiers

PMID42325358
PMCPMC13277312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.