ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Connectivity expectations as psychological contract terms in the digital workplace.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The digitalisation of work has normalised expectations of continuous employee availability, yet the relational and contractual implications of these expectations remain insufficiently theorised. This conceptual article contends that connectivity expectations constitute an implicit domain of psychological contract obligation. The perceived violation of this obligation, termed digital breach, differs phenomenologically from traditional breach. Its distinctness arises from technological mediation, which transforms personal availability from a private relational gesture into a monitored, metric-visible professional signal. Methods: Drawing on psychological contract theory, digital communication research, boundary management research, and technostress literature, the study develops the Digital Psychological Contract Model (DPCM). Results: The DPCM specifies a propositional architecture that links connectivity expectations and enacted availability behaviours, through discrepancy assessment, to digital breach, affective violation, and the erosion of organisational trust. Perceived autonomy and leadership norm-modelling enter as moderating conditions; organisational communication culture and leadership signalling enter as antecedents. Discussion: The model provides a conceptual scaffold and structured vocabulary for an emerging research programme on psychological contracts in digitally mediated work. It also differentiates digital breach from technostress, organisational injustice, and traditional contract breach, and identifies measurable indicator domains for future scale development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.