ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Bridging clinical and educational contexts: mentalization-based techniques in educational settings.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Classroom Climate and the Role of Teachers' Mentalized Affectivity: Mediation Through Job and Life Satisfaction.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mentalization, the capacity to understand one's own and others' behaviour in terms of underlying mental states such as intentions, feelings, and beliefs, has well-established clinical applications, including Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT) and its adapted variants for children and adolescents. Despite growing evidence for its effectiveness in therapeutic settings, little research has examined whether mentalization-based techniques can be systematically applied and evaluated in educational contexts, particularly for children displaying disruptive behaviour and emotional dysregulation. Aim: This study investigates whether mentalization-based techniques are effective in educational settings and analyses the performance of different techniques in resolving disruptive behaviour and incidents of emotional dysregulation. Methods: A mixed-methods design was used. An adapted version of an existing framework codifying 13 MBT-derived techniques was applied to teacher-child classroom interactions. Observations were conducted across two classrooms in an alternative provision school in London. In total, 259 distinct incidents were recorded, comprising 815 individual teacher-child interactions. Quantitative analysis used generalised linear mixed models; qualitative analysis drew on theory-driven thematic coding of interaction transcripts. Results: Analysis revealed that a mentalization approach outperformed non-mentalizing strategies in resolving classroom incidents. Among the specific techniques, Conclusion: The findings add to the emerging evidence for mentalization-based approaches as a means of supporting successful educational environments for both teachers and children. While the results cannot be interpreted as causal, they highlight the promise of incorporating mentalization-based programmes in schools. Future research should employ controlled experiments to further establish the effectiveness of mentalization techniques in addressing disruptive behaviour and emotional dysregulation in the classroom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.