SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Alexithymia in neurodevelopmental populations: a scoping review of Down syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, and dual diagnosis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alexithymia, characterized by difficulties in identifying and describing emotions, affects ~10% of the general population. Prevalence is substantially higher in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Objective: To systematically map existing research on alexithymia across Down syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, and dual diagnosis populations, synthesize current knowledge, and identify critical research gaps informing future investigation priorities. Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searches were conducted across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from inception to December 2024. Studies examining alexithymia, emotional processing, or emotional awareness in DS, ASD, or DS-ASD populations underwent selection and narrative synthesis employing thematic analysis. Results: Database searches yielded 2,847 records, of which 55 studies met inclusion criteria spanning 1994-2024. Literature demonstrates research imbalances, with extensive evidence on ASD contrasted with minimal investigation on DS and the absence of research on dual diagnoses. Six major themes emerged: prevalence disparities with ASD populations showing 49.9% weighted mean prevalence vs. unestablished DS rates; assessment limitations with current tools lacking intellectual disability validation; intervention approaches demonstrating moderate effectiveness ( Conclusion: Current evidence reveals research imbalances with extensive ASD literature contrasting with the absence of DS research, limiting understanding and evidence-based practice. The lack of dual diagnosis investigation represents a gap affecting 16-18% of individuals with DS. Priorities include developing assessment methodologies for intellectual disability populations, establishing DS alexithymia prevalence, and investigating population-specific intervention approaches to optimize therapeutic outcomes and quality of life across the neurodevelopmental spectrum. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K8UEC, identifier: OSF.IO/K8UEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.