ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Reconsidering music in stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review from auditory stimulus to relational process.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Over the past three decades, music has been increasingly incorporated into stroke motor rehabilitation; however, the term Methods: This scoping review examined how music and sound have been conceptualized and applied in stroke motor rehabilitation research published between 1993 and 2023. Ninety-seven studies were identified through major databases. Data were extracted on definitions of music and sound, auditory stimulus characteristics, delivery methods, and provider expertise, followed by numerical and thematic analyses. Results: Substantial heterogeneity was found in how musical elements and auditory designs were reported, with many studies lacking essential information on stimulus structure. Comparative analysis identified three overarching approaches: (1) stimulus-based methods targeting movement timing, (2) task-based methods involving rhythmic or instrumental performance, and (3) process-based methods emphasizing relational and interactive engagement. These approaches were positioned along a continuum ranging from mechanically oriented to relationship-centered interventions. Discussion: The findings highlight persistent conceptual ambiguity between music and sound and underscore the need for clearer and more systematic reporting of musical parameters. Conceptualizing music as a multidimensional therapeutic component may support stronger integration of neuroscientific and clinical perspectives when explaining mechanisms of stroke motor recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.