ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The impact of exercise intervention on physical self-esteem of Chinese college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study systematically synthesized relevant empirical research through meta-analysis to quantify the intervention effects of different exercise modalities on college students' physical self-esteem, identify key moderating variables driving between-study heterogeneity, and provide an evidence-based basis for colleges and universities to develop precise exercise intervention programs. Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched six electronic databases (CNKI, Wanfang Data, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) from their inception to September 7, 2025 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (Rob 2) tool was adopted to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies, the GRADE system was used to rate the quality of evidence for all core physical self-esteem-related outcomes, and effect size pooling, predefined subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were performed to explore sources of between-study heterogeneity. The study protocol was retrospectively registered with PROSPERO (Registration No. CRD420261356511). Results: A total of 12 studies involving 2,128 participants were included. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model showed that exercise intervention had a significant large positive effect on the overall level of college students' physical self-esteem (SMD = 0.95, 95% CI [0.70, 1.20], Conclusion: Current available evidence suggests that exercise interventions may improve overall physical self-esteem and all its dimensions in Chinese college students. The subgroup analyses provide preliminary indications that greater benefits may be observed in males, those receiving combined aerobic and resistance training, and healthy individuals. However, these subgroup findings are hypothesis-generating rather than definitive, and the pooled effect estimate should be interpreted with caution due to substantial between-study heterogeneity and low-to-moderate evidence quality. Future research should expand sample sizes, standardize exercise intervention parameters, and conduct head-to-head trials to verify these preliminary subgroup effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.