Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325328›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Using machine learning to predict student mathematics performance in six East Asian countries: evidence from PISA 2022.

Denis Djekourmane, Wei Zhang, Millicent Aziku, Dongfang Wu, Yang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denis DjekourmaneFaculty of education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Educational Sciences, Changji University, Changji, China.
Millicent AzikuFaculty of education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Dongfang WuFaculty of education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Yang ZhangFaculty of education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the contemporary era of artificial intelligence and rapidly evolving knowledge systems, mathematics performance has become a critical competency for younger generations. Although the mathematical achievement of students in East Asian countries has attracted increasing scholarly attention, studies employing machine learning techniques to examine the combined determinants of their success remain limited. Methods: This study evaluates six machine learning models-Random Forest, LightGBM, XGBoost, AdaBoost, Elastic Net, and Linear Regression to identify the most accurate algorithm for predicting mathematics performance among students from six high-performing East Asian countries/economies participating in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022. A sample of 26,969 fifteen-year-old students was analyzed. Following model selection, a post hoc feature selection procedure was applied, retaining the 24 most influential predictors from an initial set of 62 variables to ensure analytical parsimony while preserving model performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values and SHAP interaction analyses were employed to quantify the magnitude, direction, and heterogeneity of each predictor's contribution at the individual level, including nonlinear relationships. Results: XGBoost emerged as the optimal model, demonstrating superior predictive accuracy ( Discussion and conclusion: These findings underscore the central role of student-proximal determinants in mathematics achievement within Confucian Heritage Culture educational contexts. Interpreted through the lens of self-determination theory, the results carry important implications for educational policy and practice, particularly in prioritizing self-efficacy development, optimizing instructional time, and promoting equitable learning environments. The study also contributes theoretically and offers directions for future research.

Indexed as

East Asiamachine learningmathematics performancesPISA 2022self-determination theoryself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID42325328
PMCPMC13280795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.