ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Improving mental health outcomes through online brain health training in adults with or without mental illness.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental health promotion aims to improve well-being and quality of life for individuals and communities. However, most existing interventions target specific populations and are designed to address particular symptoms or diagnoses, limiting their reach to the general population. Therefore, there is a need to better understand the potential benefits of universal mental health promotion programs. Objective: This quasi-experimental pre-post study with matching examined the impact of an online brain health training as a mental health promotion tool for adults with and without mental illness. The program included Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART), an executive function strategy training, combined with education on daily practices that support overall health. Methods: Participants included a matched sample of 370 adults (185 with and 185 without mental illness), ages 18-87. Linear mixed-effects models were used to (1) examine baseline group differences in mental health outcomes (psychological distress, resilience, quality of life, and engagement in meaningful activities) and high-level cognitive function, operationalized as a composite measure of complex cognition ("clarity"); (2) evaluate changes in these outcomes following 6 months of online brain health training; and (3) assess associations between changes in cognitive clarity and mental health outcomes over time. Results: At baseline, participants with mental illness reported greater psychological distress, lower resilience, poorer quality of life, reduced engagement in meaningful activities, and lower cognitive clarity compared with those without mental illness. Following training, both groups demonstrated significant improvements, including reduced psychological distress and increased resilience, quality of life, and engagement in meaningful activities. Clarity improved only among participants without mental illness who completed at least the core SMART training. Across the full sample and within both groups, improvements in clarity were significantly associated with improvements in mental health outcomes, with some group differences observed. Conclusion: Online brain health training warrants further study as a mental health promotion intervention, with potential to complement standard care for individuals with mental illness and prevent emerging concerns among those without a diagnosis. Delivering this training online offers a promising, accessible pathway for population-level mental health promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.