Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325310›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

What is prepared in temporal preparation? A review and a historical appreciation.

Karin M Bausenhart, Rolf Ulrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karin M BausenhartDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Rolf UlrichDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal preparation refers to systematic changes in performance that arise when the timing of an event becomes predictable. From very early on in experimental psychology, research has shown that temporal predictability robustly shortens response times and modulates attentional states across a wide range of tasks. This review provides a comprehensive historical and contemporary synthesis of theoretical and empirical contributions to temporal preparation research. First, we present a brief overview of basic concepts, paradigms, and findings in temporal preparation research, and review mechanisms that have been suggested to address the question of how preparation emerges and how it may impact human cognitive processing. Second, in the main part of this article, we review findings from behavioral and electrophysiological studies that shed light on which cognitive processes are affected by temporal preparation in humans, aiming to take stock of the most robust empirical phenomena. Here, the main focus will be on the rich tradition of foreperiod effects, complemented by relevant results from temporal cueing and related paradigms. We show that temporal preparation has widespread consequences for cognitive processing, from increasing sensory gain to changes in response dynamics and various motor-related measures. These findings challenge traditional accounts that locate temporal preparation in specific processing stages (e.g., historically, the motor system). Instead, contemporary models must take into account a multi-component view of temporal preparation, in which preparatory processes impact various processes.

Indexed as

foreperiod effectlocusreviewtemporal attentiontemporal orientingtemporal preparation

Identifiers

PMID42325310
PMCPMC13275726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.