ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2026
First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Italy: Real-World Evidence on Utilization, Outcomes, and Healthcare Costs.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia in Western countries, mainly affecting older people. Targeted agents have reshaped first-line (1L) strategies, making real-world evidence important to complement clinical trials. Objective: To estimate the incidence of Italian patients initiating first-line CLL therapy (2019-2022) and describe demographics/clinical profile, treatment patterns, adherence, outcomes (overall survival [OS], time to next treatment [TTNT]), and healthcare costs from the perspective of the Italian National Health System (NHS). Methods: A retrospective observational study using administrative healthcare databases (~9 million residents) was conducted on CLL patients starting 1L therapy (index-date) for CLL. Baseline characteristics were assessed in the 12 months pre-index; follow-up was ≥12 months. Drug use, adherence (medication possession ratio), dose adjustments, OS, TTNT, and direct costs were analyzed with descriptive and multivariable methods. Results: A total of 1479 patients initiated 1L therapy: 63.9% chemotherapy (CHT), 23.2% ibrutinib, 3.2% acalabrutinib, and 9.7% other regimens. CHT remained common, especially among older and more comorbid patients. Ibrutinib showed lower mortality versus CHT (HR 0.663; p=0.002) and longer TTNT (median not reached). Dose adjustments were frequent; extended refill intervals did not appear to reduce drug survival. Mean annual cost per patient was €38,573, mainly driven by drug acquisition; ibrutinib users had lower hospitalization and outpatient costs than other 1L groups. Conclusion: In Italian practice, ibrutinib was the main targeted 1L option and was associated with improved survival and delayed progression versus CHT. Despite higher drug costs, reduced hospital-based resource use suggests favourable overall clinical and economic impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.