ArticleNpj biosensing2026
Interdigitated capacitive strain sensor enables precise yoga-inspired motion tracking.
Article in Npj biosensing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using Auxetic cTPU Knee-Worn Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a fully textile-based interdigitated capacitive (IDC) strain sensor for wearable posture recognition. The sensor is lightweight, comfortable, and washable, and maintained stable electromechanical performance during 6,500 strain cycles, with absolute value of the gauge factor ranging from 0.67 to 0.81 across the tested strain conditions. Integrated into clothing, the sensor captured multidimensional electrical responses, including capacitance-, resistance-, and phase-related signals, during four biomechanically distinct yoga postures: High Lunge, Lunge Forward, Squat, and Tree. Using a supervised machine-learning pipeline combining handcrafted sensor-channel features and MiniROCKET time-series features, record-level classification achieved an accuracy of 94.4% and a macro-averaged F1 score of 94.2%. Record-level five-fold cross-validation further showed stable performance across folds, supporting the robustness of the classification framework within the present controlled cohort. One-vs-rest receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded area under the curve values of 90%, 94%, 99%, and 99% for High Lunge, Lunge Forward, Squat, and Tree, respectively. Channel ablation analysis identified capacitance-derived features as the most informative predictors. Statistical and temporal analyses further showed posture-dependent differences in signal magnitude, normalized response, and waveform dynamics, while supervised low-dimensional projection revealed distinct class structure. These results demonstrate the feasibility of textile-based IDC sensing for wearable movement monitoring applications such as such digital fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.