ArticleGastroenterology research2026
Computed Tomography-Based Assessment of Sarcopenia and Disease Progression in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Radiomics and Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Gastroenterology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcopenia is a known negative prognostic factor in oncology and is frequently observed in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Computed tomography (CT) enables longitudinal muscle assessment and may provide additional prognostic information. This study aims to assess their association with prognosis in pancreatic cancer and explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of CT radiomics. Methods: A retrospective single-center study included 62 patients with primary PDAC who underwent at least three abdominal CT scans: baseline (t0), 3 months (t1), 6 months (t2), and, in 35 patients, 12 months (t3). CT-based sarcopenia was assessed using the psoas muscle index (PMI) based on reference cutoffs and cohort-specific sex-specific quartiles. Skeletal muscles at the L3 level were semi-automatically segmented. Radiomic features of the psoas were extracted and analyzed using k-nearest neighbor, decision tree, and random forest models. Prognostic relevance was evaluated using logistic regression and feature selection via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Tumor progression was assessed radiologically according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: CT-based sarcopenia prevalence was 45.3% using reference-based PMI thresholds. PMI declined significantly from baseline to t1 and remained stable thereafter, with women exhibiting consistently lower values. Outcome analysis showed a higher proportion of disease progression at t1 in sarcopenic patients using reference cutoffs, whereas cohort-specific quartiles demonstrated no consistent differences. Random forest models predicted sarcopenia with up to 0.73 accuracy and receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.81. LASSO regression identified the psoas short axis and cross-sectional area as the most informative features. Logistic regression using baseline radiomic features predicted disease progression status at 12 months with 0.85 accuracy, weighted F Conclusion: Longitudinal CT-based assessment of PMI demonstrates progressive sarcopenia within the studied PDAC cohort, with sex-specific declines. Radiomic analysis of skeletal muscle provides complementary information and predictive insights, highlighting their potential to enhance the characterization of muscle status and its association with disease course in patients able to undergo repeated imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.