ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Correcting Apparent Priming Bias Unveils Fertilizer Nitrogen-Risk Archetypes of Surplus and Depletion Across Asian Rice Systems.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate assessment of fertilizer nitrogen (N) fate is essential for optimizing rice production, yet regional-scale estimates remain limited. This progress has been fundamentally constrained by the prohibitive cost of isotopic tracing, which has not only limited large-scale deployment but also prevented the correction of apparent priming effect (APE)-induced bias, resulting in a systematic misestimation of soil N retention. To overcome this limitation, a continental-scale framework is developed to quantify fertilizer N fate across Asian rice systems. Ensemble modeling produces the first high-resolution (5 arcmin) maps of Net Residue and Loss, identifying Eastern and Central China, along with Northern India, as critical Loss hotspots. Accounting for APE reveals that positive priming suppresses the Net Residue of applied N to below 7% (-1%-15%), while 48% (43%-53%) of applied N is lost to the environment, leading to annual environmental costs of US$98.53 (83.25-108.27) billion from reactive-N emissions. Crucially, three N-risk archetypes that together encompass 42% of global rice fields emerge: 37% high-loss/high-net-residue, 2% high-loss-soil-depleting, and 3% low-loss-soil-mining. Overall, this framework converges high-resolution ensemble mapping, apparent priming bias correction, and policy-oriented N-risk archetypes to transform N governance from retrospective accounting into a spatially targeted, forward-looking strategy reconciling food security with environmental and economic sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.