SynthesisMaternal & child nutrition2026
Cleaning Methods and Microbial Safety of Child Feeding Equipment: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial contamination of child feeding equipment (CFE) includes feeding bottles, teats, and breast pumps. This contamination is a recognized pathway for enteric pathogen exposure during early childhood, particularly during the complementary feeding period (6-24 months). Inadequate or inconsistent cleaning of CFE has been associated with increased diarrheal risk. Many cleaning approaches are practiced globally. However, comparative evidence on their effectiveness remains fragmented. This systematic review (CRD420251058230) aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy of commonly used CFE cleaning methods. We included studies that assessed microbial contamination on CFE. Each study compared at least one cleaning method with another method or a control. We included all epidemiological study designs conducted globally. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from January 1970 to January 2025. Two reviewers independently screened 18,415 records and included 17 studies. Risk of bias was assessed by ROBINS-E and ROBINS-I. Feeding bottles and teats were the most frequently assessed equipment. Rinsing with water alone was consistently ineffective. Washing with soap and brushing achieved greater contamination reduction than washing without brushing. Chlorine-based disinfection substantially reduced contamination, with effectiveness varying by concentration and contact time. Sterilization by boiling or steaming, particularly when preceded by mechanical washing, achieved near-complete microbial elimination. The evidence base was limited by the small number of experimental studies. Study quality was variable, and outcomes were heterogeneous. These limitations emphasize the need for more rigorous and context-specific research to inform effective, scalable cleaning interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.