Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325019›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026

Billing for Comprehensive Dementia Care Services Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries: Implications for the GUIDE Model.

Yucheng Hou, Aanand D Naik, Karen E Joynt Maddox, Kenton J Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yucheng HouDepartment of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7727-0143
Aanand D NaikDepartment of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6936-7984
Karen E Joynt MaddoxCardiology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3779-8653
Kenton J JohnstonCenter for Advancing Health Services, Policy, and Economics Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe guiding an improved dementia experience (GUIDE) model is a nationwide payment model launched in 2024 to test monthly dementia care management payment as a tool to improve care and outcomes for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with dementia and their caregivers. GUIDE requires participating practices to provide comprehensive dementia services, including care assessment and coordination, caregiver support, and respite services. This study assessed baseline billing patterns for GUIDE-required services among eligible physician group practices prior to GUIDE implementation.

methodsUsing 2022 Medicare clinician and practice data, we identified a national sample of eligible physician group practices for GUIDE, defined as having at least one dementia-proficient clinician. Among eligible practices, we examined the variation in their billing patterns for GUIDE-required services under the Medicare fee-for-service fee schedule. We identified and decomposed practice-level factors predictive of billing for any GUIDE services and assessed the association between these factors and service volume.

resultsAmong 4737 eligible practices, 60% billed for GUIDE-required services; however, these services were substantially underused by dementia-proficient clinicians. Practices billing for more required services under fee-for-service were larger, more likely to participate in other risk-based payment models, such as accountable care organizations, but had smaller dementia caseload shares and served patients with lower overall clinical risks.

conclusionsBefore GUIDE implementation, billing for required services varied substantially across eligible practices and was underused by dementia-proficient clinicians. These baseline differences may help explain early participation patterns and inform future evaluations of whether GUIDE incentives build capacity for delivering comprehensive dementia care.

Indexed as

Comprehensive Health CareDementiaFee-for-Service PlansMedicareAgedFemaleHumansMaleUnited Statesdementia careMedicarepayment models

Identifiers

PMID42325019
PMCPMC13496372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.