Observational studyCirculation. Population health and outcomes2026
Optimizing Care in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: Registry Data From the Cardiometabolic Center Alliance.
Observational study in Circulation. Population health and outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVD) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome. Adoption of guideline-directed medical therapy remains suboptimal. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a team-based multisite care model on improving quality and reducing disparities in patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.
methodsWe conducted a prospective clinical cohort study across 9 US sites of the Cardiometabolic Center Alliance, a network of health care organizations with a standardized approach to address CVD risk, between May 2020 and August 2024. Consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes/prediabetes and CVD and chronic kidney disease were enrolled in a clinical program with team care, structured visits, and standardized assessments. Cardiometabolic risk factor levels and proportion of adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy were assessed using longitudinal mixed-effects models accounting for clustering by site.
resultsTwo thousand two hundred twenty-three individuals were enrolled with a mean (SD) age of 63.9 (11.2) years, 44.2% female, 84.0% White, and 62.5% noncommercially insured; 58.5% had atherosclerotic CVD, 32.6% heart failure, and 29.5% chronic kidney disease. Median follow-up was 6.8 (4.0-9.4) months. Participants had reductions in weight (mean [95% CI], -16.7 [-17.9 to -15.6] lbs), body mass index (-2.6 [-2.8 to -2.4] kg/m
conclusionsThe Cardiometabolic Center Alliance model is feasible and effective, leading to significant improvement in CVD risk factors and increased utilization of GDMT. Implementation and dissemination of this paradigm remains a priority to close gaps in cardiometabolic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.