Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324915›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2026

Mlp1 and Mlp2 cooperate to build a stoichiometric nuclear pore basket in budding yeast.

Keri Schmidt, Alexandra P Schürch, Elisa Dultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keri SchmidtInstitute of Biochemistry, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0001-1959-2830
Alexandra P SchürchInstitute of Biochemistry, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-4085-4450
Elisa DultzInstitute of Biochemistry, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1114-5523

Funding

ETH ZurichSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 320030-236124Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 320030-236124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is the only gateway between the nucleus and the cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells. Its nucleoplasmic face is decorated by the nuclear basket, a filamentous structure with important roles in mRNA export and chromatin organization. In contrast to major parts of the nuclear pore scaffold, the architecture of the nuclear basket remains poorly defined. Here, we investigate the interactions required for formation and maintenance of the nuclear basket in vivo using budding yeast. Although previous work has often focused on Mlp1, the largest and most abundant nuclear basket protein, we demonstrate that its paralogue, Mlp2, also plays a central role in nuclear basket architecture. Mlp2 can interact with the NPC scaffold independently of Mlp1, and interactions between the coiled-coil regions of both proteins stabilize their binding. Furthermore, the N-termini of both Mlp1 and Mlp2 are required for recruitment of Pml39. In addition, we show that Pml39 uses its N- and C-terminal helices to recruit additional Mlp1 subunits. We propose a refined model of nuclear basket architecture with a stoichiometry of 4:2:1 per spoke for Mlp1:Mlp2:Pml39.

Indexed as

Nuclear PoreNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsProtein BindingRNA-Binding ProteinsMLP1 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsMlp1Mlp2Nuclear pore basketNuclear pore complexS. cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID42324915
PMCPMC13490735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.