ArticleChemical research in toxicology2026
Beyond Heuristics: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in QSAR via Adaptive Conformal Prediction.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable quantification of uncertainty is critical for the interpretation and regulatory use of the QSAR models. Applicability domain (AD) assessment was introduced precisely for this purpose─the original OECD guidance defines AD in terms of prediction reliability─yet in practice AD metrics output heuristic similarity scores without statistically guaranteed confidence estimates. We present conformal prediction as a calibration layer that retrofits any QSAR models into a confidence predictor, producing prediction intervals for regression and prediction sets for classification at a user-specified nominal confidence level (e.g., 90%), with statistically guaranteed coverage, without retraining, using only model predictions and a calibration set. The guarantee holds under the exchangeability assumption─that calibration and test compounds are drawn from the same input space─and follows as a mathematical consequence of the rank-based calibration procedure. When the assumption is violated, coverage may fall below the nominal level─signaled by widening intervals and shrinking singleton rates. The framework uses auxiliary models trained on molecular fingerprints as nonconformity scores, a role that most existing AD indices can equally fulfill; a novel ordinal distance strategy extends the approach to hard-label classifiers by generating pseudoproabilities compatible with standard conformal methods. Applied to over 100 VEGA QSAR models spanning physicochemical properties, toxicity, and environmental endpoints, the framework consistently achieves nominal coverage across all models and endpoint types. Conformal efficiency metrics─prediction interval width for regression and singleton rate for classification─correlate strongly with AD indices, demonstrating that CP formalizes and quantifies what AD heuristics approximate: the relationship between structural novelty and prediction reliability, successfully transforming heuristic chemical similarity into statistically valid prediction intervals or label sets. Large-scale application to the EPA CompTox chemical inventory demonstrates practical deployment at a regulatory scale. An open-source pipeline facilitates application to any QSAR/QSPR platform, enabling an improved transparency and reliability assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.