Observational studyMuscle & nerve2026
Muscle Ultrasound Is a Sensitive Outcome Measure in ALS.
Observational study in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsMuscle ultrasound is a potential outcome measure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), although prospective, multicenter longitudinal studies are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate muscle ultrasound as an outcome in ALS and compare its sensitivity with clinical and neurophysiological metrics.
methodsIn this prospective two-center cohort study, adults with ALS underwent baseline and follow-up assessments at least 3 months apart. Clinical measures included the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and Medical Research Council sum scores. Median nerve abductor pollicis brevis and ulnar nerve first dorsal interosseous compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitudes were recorded. Muscle ultrasound of 11 bulbar and limb muscles was performed using harmonized protocols, with offline analysis of muscle thickness and echogenicity. Longitudinal change and effect sizes were calculated.
resultsTwenty-two patients were included (median age 59.3 years, follow-up 9.6 months, disease duration 23.1 months). ALSFRS-R declined by -3.0 points (-0.7% per month; effect size 0.84). Median nerve CMAP amplitude decreased by -1.6 mV (-1.2% per month; effect size 0.77). Muscle echogenicity increased by 0.8 units (+6.0% per month), yielding the largest effect size (1.09), with increases across multiple muscles. Responsiveness improved with onset-specific muscle selection, with biceps brachii (effect size 1.12) and gastrocnemius (1.18) showing the strongest changes. Muscle thickness and fasciculation frequency did not change. DISCUSSION: Muscle ultrasound echogenicity is a sensitive structural biomarker of ALS progression, demonstrating greater responsiveness than ALSFRS-R and CMAP over 3-12 months. Its accessibility and sensitivity support its utility as an outcome measure in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.