Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324847›Full record

Trial reportHuman psychopharmacology2026

Verbal and Visuospatial Working Memory Performance During the CO

Warren Dunger, Marc Edwards, Alex Board, Matthew Garner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Warren DungerSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Marc EdwardsSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alex BoardSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Matthew GarnerSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9481-2226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAnxiety influences working memory performance, but the effects on clinical neuropsychological assessments of working memory are not well known.

methodsWe examined the effect of anxiety, induced using the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety on standardized clinical neuropsychological tests of working memory and executive function in a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover within-subjects design.

resultsThe CO

conclusionsThe CO

Indexed as

AnxietyCarbon DioxideMemory, Short-TermAdultCross-Over StudiesExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultCarbon DioxideanxietyCO2 Challengeneuropsychological assessmentworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42324847
PMCPMC13284529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.